IRIG-B optical fiber delay measurement
|
Result: 10.008 µsec +/- 2 nsec
|
|---|
Hardware Setup
The orignal fiber interfaces of the TrueTime modules needed to be
modified to a) add signal buffers for the DC-shifted IRIG-B signals
for scope access and b) feed back the fiber signal from the ODDAQ VME
crate to the XL-DC receiver in the Radon Hut.

1) Fiber Interface Board of TrueTime XL-DC Receiver in Radon Hut

The original fiber interface module (see
photo) only consisted of a optical fiber transmission LED (HFBR-1414T,
of the Hewlett Packard HFBR-0400 series) and 2 driver ICs
converting the IRIG-B DC-shifted signal coming from the XL-DC main
electronics.
The new home-made module (see photo or
schematics) has an additional optical fiber
receiver sensor (HFBR-2416T, also of the
Hewlett Packard HFBR-0400 series) for the feedback signal
from the SK center hut. In addition, it has drivers and LEMO jacks for
both, the source IRIG-B signal and the feedback signal for easy oscilloscope
access (see photo of cabling setup).
2) Fiber Interface VME Module for TrueTime VME-SG in SK Center Hut

The original fiber interface module (see
photo) only consists of an optical fiber receiver sensor and RS422 signal
converter for transfering the IRIG-B signal to the TrueTime VME-SG module
via the VME backplane.
The new home-made VME module (see photo or
schematics) has, like the new XL-DC interface
above, an additional optical fiber transmission LED (HFBR-1414T) to
re-transmit the IRIG-B signal back to the radon hut via the spare fiber.
Also in addition, it has a driver and a LEMO jack for easy oscilloscope
access of the IRIG-B DC-shift signal (see
photo of VME cabling).
Measurements with Digital Oscilloscope
IRIG-B output versus feedback delay at XL-DC receiver in Radon Hut

Photos above show oscilloscope screendumps. From left to right:
- (photo 1) made at 10 msec/div
horizontal resolution:
- channel 1: 1PPS output of XL-DC receiver (TTL level)
- channel 2: IRIG-B DC-shift signal of XL-DC receiver before
converted to optical pulse sequence at optical fiber LED.
As shown, the leading edge of the second 8-msec pulse of the IRIG-B
"frame" ID (double 8-msec pulse sequence) coincides with the 1PPS
leading edge.
- (photo 2) same as above, but
zommed in at 10 nanosec/div horizontal resolution at leading edge of
1PPS pulse and by using "infinite persistence" display option.
As shown, there is just a minimal (neglectible) propagtion delay of
approx. 6 nanoseconds between the 1PPS and second "frame" pulse of the
IRIG-B and no visible jitter.
- (photo 3) made at 10 msec/div
horizontal resolution:
- channel 1: IRIG-B DC-shift signal of XL-DC receiver before
converted to optical pulse sequence at optical fiber LED.
- channel 2: IRIG-B feedback input signal right after conversion
from optical fiber receiver sensor
This just shows that transmitted and feedback IRIG-B signals are
identical, just slightly delayed (not noticeable at this horizontal
time resolution).
- (photo 4) same as above, but
made at 5 µsec/div. Here, the delay between output IRIG-B and
its feedback signal coming from the SK center hut is already highly
noticable at approx. 20 µseconds +/- 20 nsec.
- (photo 5) same as above, but
zoomed in at 50 nanosec/div, centered around the channel 2 leading edge.
The leading edge of channel 1 is moved far left ouside the screen area,
but the oscilloscope's internal measurement option allows here for
very precise resolution of approx. +/-2 nsec (including signal
jitter within the TTL-to-fiber conversion electronics).
As shown, the signal delay between the original pulses and its feedback
over the whole fiber link (2-way) is 20.0162 µseconds (+/- 2 nsec).
Thus, the one-way delay over the 2km fiber from Radon Hut to SK Center
Hut (including the conversion electronics) is half of that number, or:
|
10.008 µseconds +/- 2 nanoseconds |
|---|
Taking into account the electronics propagation delays in the
signal chain [TTL/RS422 driver(s), TTL-to-optical, and optical-to-TTL]
which account to approx. 80-100 nanoseconds, then the optical propagation
delay in the optical fiber can be estimated to as 4.954 nsec/meter
or 20.186 cm/nsec.
IRIG-B signal versus 1PPS signal of VME-SG module in SK Center Hut

Photos above show oscilloscope screendumps. From left to right:
- (photo 1) same as the first photo
above, just to show how the VME-SG's 1PPS output and the IRIG-B pulses
from the XL-DC receiver are related.
- (photo 2) almost same as above, but
zommed in at 100 nanosec/div horizontal resolution at leading edge of
1PPS pulse and by using "infinite persistence" display option.
- channel 1: 1PPS output of VME-SG receiver (TTL level)
- channel 2: IRIG-B DC-shift signal of XL-DC receiver after
converted from optical pulse sequence from 2km fiber
from Radon Hut.
Here, the VME-SG's 1PPS signal is clearly not stable compared with the IRIG-B pulse
sequence (or vice versa). Notice the almost discrete 100 nsec
steps in the signals at -300,-200, and +400 nsec offset from the
horizontal center. This indicates that the VME-SG module is generating
the 1PPS pulses only slowly synchronized by the IRIG-B signal from the remote
XL-DC receiver by using 100 nsec steps from its internal 10 MHz clock.
This is good enough for 1 µsec resolution, but too jittery for
our 100 nsec goal for K2K. Alternative solution: instead of using
the VME-SG's 1PPS pulse, I'm planning to add a circuit to the optical
fiber interface that extracts the 1PPS pulse directly from the IRIG-B
sequence by identifying the IRIG-B "frame" leading edge. This can
be done with a minimal jitter of just approx. 5 nsec worst case compared
to the IRIG-B signal. Downside: If there's a power outage in the Radon
Hut, then there's nor free running 1PPS pulse either ...
HGB, December 15, 1998.